click this doll house for more detail

click this doll house for more detail
Rijksmuseum Amsterdam

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

the self's encounter with time

Where does one place the truth of time? Is the continuous flow a part of the objective world of nature, or does it belong to the logic and a priori understanding of the conscious subject. The existence "in" the world, and the motions of matter, creates the domain we experience as phenomena. The share in the All and the world-soul... are we not subjectively percieving the moment from one perspective?

The self draws back into a place of no time - a meeting place for the beings willing to journey beyond the cave of darkness. At once we see the thinkers contemplating the truth to "this" eternity that transcends both space and time.

The self cannot distinguish at times whether the experience and perceptions are a manifestation - "a phenomena" - created by the subjective mind, or whether the objective nature exists as a continuum beyond the self. This is not a negation of the existence of the world... it is a questioning of how and what logical association the subjectivity of the self has with the cosmic narrative as a whole. This questioning includes questioning perception itself.

The non linear-ality of the flow of time, and our "personal" views on the interpretation of consciousness in relation to existence.

The self is not the All, but only a minute glimpse, a drop of water in the sea of the eternality of process. From this place, interpretation of phenomena and the coming to "know" in an intuitive way the pure moment of the nakedness of nature... "truth?"

Who am I?
Isolation, a natural outcome of the dis-enchanted modern world. The self realizes that it has, to a degree, assimilated the self nature of previous worlds. Is this not the post-modern process? The merging of and seeing the world from a premodern perspective - the making of a new system, a change in the relationship of "identity". Consciousness does not live in only "one" system of beliefs, but can learn the how of the intuitive process of "coming to be" - a being that is both of the past and future of existence.

It is a, reverting back, to the unity of its essential nature. "Existential meaning" and "post-modern meaning" becomes a reconstruction of the premodern world with the variables of a disunified and "in the dark" modern system that is falling short of its ideals.

The self sits and stills the mind, allowing itself to reconnect to the divine, "emanating" source - a meditation on its own essential nature in a non-a posteriori direction towards truth. 

Being emerges not as a will-to-power but as a will-to-contemplate - a process of opening itself to the possibility of coming to feel the presence of the eternal thou. Time no longer is a logical measure of duration, but a necessary part of the experience of phenomena. From one interpretive lens to the next, consciousness realizes the diversity of views appearing on the back drop - the space of the eternity of the All.

"Identity" becomes something that has transcended time in its functionality. Yet, the question remains what is "essence"? The light of the inner self burns to understand...

"Truth"
Truth becomes the destination for the self that is in the process of identifying with the essence. In this way, "truth" and "essence"  is intimately linked through the will-to-be. Being re-emerges out of the confines of time as the clarity of the moment takes hold.

But is this process leading to Essence and Truth? The ever expansive diversity, unified by the mind that contemplates its place in the cosmic whole. The All emerges and the order of existence makes itself known to the self, in thought. From this perspective, the unity of the All manifests itself in the mind as truth of a thinker contemplating the question of identity and existence.

Existence becomes both a practical skill and an artistic/aesthetic expression of the coming-to-"know" one's own being in its most intimate moments.


Monday, May 7, 2012

reflections on the weekend in SF

A whirl-wind of a journey, as the self encounters the multiplicity of worlds, a unified diversity. At times as a transcendent intellect living as a being devoid of its corporeal features, at other times life-living as a will-to-identity. The seduction of a city  that lives and breaths the air of its multitudes of phenomenal environments. The sensibility of the self, learns to assimilate the values of an individual beyond the foreign-ness of the situation. The coming to "know", an intimate process of unity with the city of light and darkness.

We encounter the All - "the oneness of the universe" - from the subjectivity of personal experience. The moment when the totality of existence is comprehended, however impartial, by our conscious minds, we sense a wonder and an awareness that transcends language. Yet, philosophy and the art of expression tries in its earnestness to express in language, the experience of life-living as a being in pure thought of the meaning of existence in the universe, the one uni-verse that envelops us all.

The separation between animate and inanimate, living-souls and material objects, consciousness and the empirical world, provides us with the frame work for the mind's ability to understand our very own "nature". We exist in the different domains of space, as extension in the material world, and as thought/consciousness in the world of the Mind... like an eternal river flowing through time... "Time" is the medium, the eternal continuum that the will and life-living takes center stage, as the moment of awareness becomes an unification of subjective thought with the workings of the natural world.

The mysterious comes to the fore of conscious thought, as the stillness of the mind, makes the empirical world a phenomena of appearances. We learn from logical inference, that our perceptions of the world is purely "personal" without a perspective of seeing/experiencing/thinking beyond our own consciousness. It is this isolation that the artist, through the medium of philosophy has any reason to create its art work - its momentary landscape, a brushstroke of perception - so that "we" can experience the All of the world from the perspective of the mind's eye.

Our identities emerge a confluence of narratives take shape in the grand narrative of the objective All. Meaning becomes a subjective matter, as the "I" emerges out of the necessity to understand the essence behind the link between the self and the phenomena that it encounters. The self creates an identity that transcends its body, by identifying with the world of the mind and the linguistic structures to a reality of thought. Although the "I" is by necessity a body interacting in the objective and natural world, its identity is a construct of its own narrative in harmony with the narrative of the All.


Somewhere in the depth of consciousness lies the structures of the transcendent world. The "we" of the community, affirms itself in the individuality of the self. The "I" becomes a "reflection" of the essence of the community of light, giving the harmonious whole a telos beyond the darkness of the cave. The unity of the "I" with the "We", and the unity of the human community with the ideals of harmony, moves the present onward to the future of Being.

Self-nature becomes, not a question of identity, but a search into the depths of the Mind and Soul. The striving to "bring-down" or "bring-to-the-present" the transcendent character through the will... a representation of a being that has unified itself to the essence of the "we" of transcendence. Meditation becomes the medium to self contemplate its place in the hierarchy of beings, only to find itself "in" the social-world of dis unified nature. The order, yet to appear, with an awareness for self-nature to realize its isolation from... but also its unity with... the community of transcendent thought. The self spiritualizes itself to form a pure idea of the Platonic "Good" - the essence of identity.

The sense of taste, envelops the world, as the soul momentarily experiences sweetness, while realizing the wisdom of an old and distinguished "other". As the taste of "Life" moves the moment... is it not unification of the self to the Will of the All of nature. A complexity of tastes, unified into the oneness of the source. The emanation of the heavenly aroma brings the self into contact with a foreign and mysterious world. The feeling and intuition that the self is intimately interconnected to the past and future of its own being. With this, the self enters a space where discovery follows necessarily as the rhythms of the moment takes the soul into the desert night.

The self's relationship with its phenomena, at times a wonder, at other times a detachment. The diversity of the world and the forms that are contained in the All, an experience that transcends the medium of language. The creatures that we are, choosing our place in the hierarchy of beings... ascending and descending on the ladder of perfection. A contradiction of sorts, as the representation of the world and the environment that surrounds the self impresses a diversity of ideas onto the mind. The narrative of the All and the knowing of particulars, becomes a task never fully complete. The most that the self can "know" are the structures of reality and the logic behind the diversity of the particulars. Yet, "the other" that impresses its image onto the self, makes known the difference of subjectivity.

---
Life in the social world necessitates the need to identify with the world-soul as a Being of authenticity. The will-to-be, finding its actions to be complex. Simplification of the self's narrative, a slowing down of the self to the rhythms of Nature. To begin again as the spring transitions into the summer days, the self learns to be.
---

The natural world and the creatures of habit, occupy a space that allows for habitation in a way of survival and "existence". Society has grown and withered and with this growth and corruption, the rise and fall of culture - the diversification of forms that has dis-enchanted the world that was once a unity of sorts. No longer attached to the natural world, we have become creatures that have descended into the realm of "modernity". Souls with consciousness no longer acknowledge one another in the openness of the other, busied by the media-generated content devoid of any meaning. In the heap of diversity in a world in which unnatural creatures semi-conscious of the forms only familiar to themselves are living a life that lacks the content of Being as a mind contemplating the eternal truths about the natural world.

Aesthetics becomes a difficult word to assimilate as the authenticity of character tries to emerge in the will-to-write. In "this" world, the self in thought, constructs the structures of phenomena in a sensible way, placing the souls as a process and transition from one state to another. It is a return or re-discovery of a platonic cosmology with overtones of the an Aristotelian process. While the self learns to refine its being, to be in harmony with both the natural world and society at large, the goals and endeavours - the telos - "the light that paves the path", appears to the soul that believes in the essence of its identity.

Saturday, April 28, 2012

Aristotle: the desire to understand

"epesteme" 

"to understand" the nature of one's own Being, the objective of the self in the process of the journey beyond the cave of darkness. Awareness at once lifts the soul towards an ascent into a realm where the phenomena of the environment, the sanctuary of the self, brings a serene wonder - the telos of discovering the nature of our own existence, as a being that unifies the domains of the divine and that of the mundane. The euporia or "easy passage or travel" brings to the fore of life-living in intellectual simplicity, a coming to know the rhythms of the moment. Thought, thinking itself, as the mind's eye opens to see the light of the spiritual world, as the soul of the self is enveloped and dissolves into the world-soul...

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Immanuel Kant
General Observations on Transcedental Aesthetic

[quote]:
To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explai, as clearly as possible, what our view is regarding the fundamental constitution of sensible knowledge in general. 
What we have meant to say is that all our intuition is nothing but the representation of appearance; that the things which we intuit are not in themselves what we intuit them as being, nor their relations so consituted in themselves as they appear to us, and that  if the subject, or even only the subjective constitution of the senses in general, be removed, the whole consitution and all the relations of objects in space and time, nay space and time themselves, would vanish. As appearances, they cannot exist in themselves, but only in us. What objects may be in themselves, and apart from all this receptivity of our sensibility, remains completely unknown to us. We know nothing but our mode of perceiving them - a mode which is peculiar to us, and not necessarily shared in by every being, though, certainly, by every human being. With this alone have we any concern. Space and time are its pure forms, and sensation in general its matter. The former alone can we know a priori, that is, prior to all actual perception; and such knowledge is therefore called pure intuition. The latter is that in our knowledge which leads to its being called a posteriori knowledge, that is, empirical intuition. The former inhere in our sensibility with absolute necessity, no matter of what kind our sensations may be; the latter can exist in varying modes. Even if we could bring our intuition to the highest degree of clearness, we should not thereby come any nearer to the consitution of objects in themselves. We should still know only our mode of intuition, that is, our sensibility. We should, indeed, know it completely, but always under the conditions of space and time - conditions which are originally inherent in the subject. What the objects may be in themselves would never become known to us even though the most enlightened knowledge of that which is alone given to us, namely, their appearance.
The concept of sensibility and of appearance would be falsified, and our whole teaching in regard to them would be rendered empty and useless, if we were to accept the view that our entire sensibility is nothing but a confused representation of things, containing only what belongs to them in themselves, but in doing so under an aggregation of characters and partial representations that we do not consciously distinguish. For the difference between a confused and a clear representation is merely logical, and does not concern the content. No doubt the concept of 'right', in its common-sense usage, contains all that the subtlest speculation can develop out of it, though in its ordinary and practical  use we are not conscious of the manifold representations comprised in this thought. But we cannot say that the common concept is therefore sensible, containing a mere appearance. For 'right' can never be an appearance; it is a concept in the understanding, and represents a property (the moral property) of actions, which belongs to them in themselves. The representation of a body in intuition, on the other hand, contains nothing that can belong to an object in itself, but merely the appearance of something, and the mode in which we are affected by that something; and this receptivity of our faculty of knowledge is termed sensibility. Even if that appearance could become completely transparent to us, such knowledge would remain toto coelo different from knowledge of the object in itself.
 ---

The self transcends the isolation of its own subjectivity, in the clarity of thought presented to us by Kant. The "I" exists limited to its own interpretive "sensibilities", only viewing the phenomenal appearance from its own subjectivity, not knowing "the other" in itself, except through its own interpretive lense. Yet connections are made in the aesthetics of thought, as thinker comes to know its own existence in a lucid and precise manner: "transcendence". The apprehension of the world of phenomena hangs by a thin thread - one's own conciousness of the world of appearance. But the moment of clarity described by Kant, gives the reader a sense of unity-of-the-us, of thought. The process of coming to know "the other" as a thou-of-life becomes the focal point in the life-living of the self, as a being in openness. Is this not the 'right' action in its common sense usage, a sensibitliy to come to understand the soul of the other in the space through the continuum of time?

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

The clarity of Zen


"the moment"

"the choice"

"affirmation"

"life"

"satori"

---

What more does one have to say?




Saturday, April 21, 2012

Berkeley revealed... "a thank you"

"Pristine"...

As the self encounters the being of "the other", the path towards the light of the world-to-come, unfolds in the present-ness of the moment. However brief, the self crosses paths with "the other", as a thou-of-life. The revelations of the world reflect upon the phenomena, as "art" manifests itself in the environment of creativity.

As the oneness of the universe envelops the individual souls, beauty appears in the many modalities, a fullness of expression. For once, a spiritual being transcending the limitations of existence for a being not as an "I" but as a "we" of the community of expressive souls. The wonders, the fireworks going off in the distant, signalling a synchronicity, makes itself known again in a more lucid manner.

Infinite wisdom and the nature of "the other" open for dialogue - the process of getting to know the All of life-living, one moment at a time. The new-ness that seems all so familiar, the encountering of Platon-ic friendships - existence of a vibrant world...

"enchanted"

as the rhythms begin to take hold of the soul of the individuals, the "music" manifests itself in the nature of the created environment - an emanation of light. The objective world becomes a meeting place where individual subjectivities learn to transcend the isolation of the mind. Spirit and identities emerge!

"Nature-ality of being", smells the aroma of the rose for the experience of grounding. The self realizes the "moment", enveloped  by the beauty of nature. A quiet "thank you", a praise to the holy of holies for making a reality known to the soul who finds "the other" on a journey of uniqueness. Majestic and vibrant, a future encounter awaits, as the spiritual domains open up with the liberality of phenomena.

The cycle of the week comes to a close, a resting place for the soul that yearns for the divine. Are we not spiritual beings having the human experience, as the new day begins? The "World-Soul" makes itself known to the "we" of the life-time of experience.

"Thank you, again" 

Thursday, April 19, 2012

dialogue

Nature and the representation to the senses (the empirical world), presents a picture of reality in its totality manifested to the self's subjectivity. This picture is like an eternal river flowing - at times rapid and chaotic, at other times peaceful and serene. As inhabitants (as creatures) with the innate ability to consciously understand and know our place in the river, view nature from the perspective of a single drop of water. The ever changing continuum appears to the conscious self as a process for growth and understanding. "I am", as the self emerges from a nothingness towards the All of life-living.

Past and future converge for a moment of awareness sacred and holy, a subtle existence as a being conscious of its ability to apprehend. The river of life, at times can be comprehended from the perspective of the self, viewing its world as a manifestation of its subjectivity (phenomena), and at other times as objective nature without the view towards any single perspective. Between these two lenses emerges the purpose and telos - the unification of these two views - to systematically and artistically represent the process in its life-living - an aesthetic practice - a choice/duty to transcend and go beyond the confines of the darkness for the light of rationality and pure identity.

The nothingness of the self parallels the isolation of the self from the world of nature as a mind and intellect living as a being beyond what phenomenal appearance can transmit. Interpretation is the becoming of the self as a being in its artistic authenticity.

The self beckons the other by asking the question of identity: "where are you"? 

The thou of life emerges - "Here I am"!